This page is also available in: English (אנגלית)
The war on terrorism is changing form, moving from battlefields to courtrooms, and from bullets to the finances that make terror attacks possible.
In Afghanistan, on Nov. 19, the U.S. military bombed 10 of the Taliban’s opium production factories. According to Stars and Stripes it was “the first major use of new White House-approved authorities to target the insurgents’ revenue stream.”
The actions pull from a tried and true method of combating terrorism, which aims to collapse the organizations at their foundations, by disabling the complex web of front money-movers, organized crime, and “charity” front operations.
“You see that the current organizations are evolving, thinking of new strategies, new ways to fight the West; and we have to fight back in similar ways—we have to think out of the box,” said Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, president of Shurat HaDin, a Tel Aviv-based law center that represents the families of terrorist victims.
According to Darshan-Leitner, the method of attacking the financial lifeblood of terrorist groups is among the most successful methods used by Israel, and the Israelis have been working to pass it onto the United States and its allies.
She presents the history of the Mossad operation behind this strategy in her new book, “Harpoon: Inside the Covert War Against Terrorism’s Money Masters,” co-authored by New York Times bestselling author and documentary filmmaker Samuel M. Katz.
The method was developed by Israel’s former director of the Mossad, the late Meir Dagan, nicknamed the “King of Shadows.” In 1996 he formed Harpoon as a financial counterterrorism taskforce of soldiers, special agents, hackers, accountants, and lawyers.
Darshan-Leitner said in a phone interview that Harpoon had one goal: “to go and choke the oxygen that drives the terror organizations,” and which was embodied in the agency’s slogan of “follow the money, target the money, and kill the money.”
“Israel saw what others did not see—that money is the source for terrorism, and if you can stop the flow of the money you can stop the flow of the terrorism,” she said.
It wasn’t long before the Israeli agents were knocking on the doors of U.S. agencies to inform them of terrorist finance networks in the United States. This included charities run by the terrorist group Hamas to finance its attacks, and a Hezbollah counterfeit operation that had amassed close to $50 million.
“But everybody ignored it,” said Darshan-Leitner. The focus then was on the terrorists calling the shots and carrying out the attacks, not on the financial enablers.
“Everybody targeted the combatants, everybody targeted the headquarters, the places where they hid their missiles or launched their missiles,” she said, “but nobody thought to go after the funding.”
The attitude changed, however, after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, and it became clear that the war on terror wasn’t just an Israeli problem. And soon, the United States was collaborating with the seasoned Israelis to see how they fought terrorism.
“Israel and the United States learned long ago that there are no white collar jobs in the terror organizations—that if you move money you become a target,” Darshan-Leitner said.
The method has been instrumental with helping curb attacks from the Palestinian Authority, and the Palestine Liberation Organization before it. The terrorist organizations compensate families of people who carry out suicide attacks on Israelis, and the more people they kill, the more they get paid.
“If terrorists know that once they blow themselves up that there will be nobody to take care of their families, they will really consider whether to do it or not,” Darshan-Leitner said. “A lot of this funding encourages terrorists to carry out attacks.”
During the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict, Hamas was running short on funds and families of combatants were complaining to the terrorist group about the lack of pay. Darshan-Leitner said, “They were desparate, so eventually Hamas sent the money-men to Iran, they gave them $13 million in suitcases, and then Israel targeted the person, shot missiles at his car, and took him down.”
Soon after the money was lost, Hamas negotiated a ceasefire with Israel.
Harpoon used similar approaches to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Meir Dagan regarded a military attack on a nuclear system as a last resort, and instead turned to short-of-war options including financial sanctions, diplomatic pressure, cyberattacks, and direct assassinations of Iran’s nuclear scientists.
According to Samuel M. Katz, the methods are quickly becoming the new face of warfare. He said in a phone interview, “the interesting thing about warfare is when someone creates a new level, a new dimension, in how conventional and unconventional campaigns are raised.”
He noted that the story of Meir Dagan and others who developed the new warfighting methods are worth a close look. “These were individuals who had spent their lifetimes fighting Israel’s wars, fighting terrorism.”
Some operations dealt with issues that weren’t as simple as they may have appeared on the surface. He noted that when Harpoon tracked Hamas finances to charity organizations, many of which were based in the United States, the charities were often providing services to its citizens that Hamas refused to provide.
Yet, while Hamas kept its charitable and militant wings separate, Katz noted, the aid to civilians went with a price, and “the price of allegiance to this organization was waging a ‘holy war,’ and it was a ‘holy war’ that resulted in countless suicide bombings on Israeli civilians.”
He said the actions of Harpoon to stop the flow of finances “became a very successful tool” in ending many terror campaigns of Hamas and Hezbollah.
The new methods also opened up new ways of understanding threats, and how to prevent them. With suicide bombers, Katz noted that the people carrying out the attacks are rarely the only ones involved. Behind the suicide bombers are the military organizers who pay the bomb builders, there is money needed for the facility and equipment to create the bombs, and there is also money needed to compensate the families of the terrorists.
If finances are removed from the equation, the whole system unravels. This may not prevent the individual self-starters, Katz said, but “the well-funded, sleek, secretive, highly-capable terror cells launching from oversees is something the financial campaign has been capable of stopping.”
“There is a lot of money to be made in terror,” Katz said. “I think one of the mistakes that governments have made in terror is that they look at the ideology or religious end, and not the business.”
He said that it would be effective to look as terror “as a criminal enterprise that could be defeated with money.”